Vyhledávat v databázi titulů je možné dle ISBN, ISSN, EAN, č. ČNB, OCLC či vlastního identifikátoru. Vyhledávat lze i v databázi autorů dle id autority či jména.

Projekt ObalkyKnih.cz sdružuje různé zdroje informací o knížkách do jedné, snadno použitelné webové služby. Naše databáze v tuto chvíli obsahuje 3150518 obálek a 950589 obsahů českých a zahraničních publikací. Naše API využívá většina knihoven v ČR.

Registrovat »    Zapomenuté heslo?

Prospects for a new structuralism

Rok: 1992.
ISBN: 9789027235978
ISBN: 9781556191589
OKCZID: 110400822

Citace (dle ČSN ISO 690):
LIEB, Hans-Heinrich., ed. Prospects for a new structuralism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1992. vi, 276 s. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Ser. 4, Current issues in linguistic theory, vol. 96.


Anotace

This volume, which has partly grown from a Round Table at the 14th International Congress of Linguists, argues for a large amount of underlying unity in outlook among different frameworks in present-day linguistics: the contemporary Prague School; the Noematic approach; the UNITYP model; Integrational Linguistics; Natural Morphology; much recent work in phonology; and Popperian Interactionism as applied, in particular, to historical linguistics. Section 1 discusses philosophical issues such as realism vs. cognitivism; Section 2 characterizes current frameworks and Section 3 deals with individual linguistic areas like phonology. Leading representatives of the various approaches are shown to agree in subscribing to most if not all of nine "Principles of New Structuralism" that combine ontological realism with non-cognitivist mentalism. These principles define a position that is structuralist in a novel sense and appears to be partly represented also in approaches such as Katzian "Platonism" and Searle's intentionalism; it should be compatible with frameworks like GPSG. There are definite historical connections with European structuralism. The position is incompatible with current cognitivism of the "mechanism" type but otherwise bridges traditional oppositions such as the dichotomy of generative vs. non-generative frameworks.


Dostupné zdroje

Přidat komentář a hodnocení