Vyhledávat v databázi titulů je možné dle ISBN, ISSN, EAN, č. ČNB, OCLC či vlastního identifikátoru. Vyhledávat lze i v databázi autorů dle id autority či jména.

Projekt ObalkyKnih.cz sdružuje různé zdroje informací o knížkách do jedné, snadno použitelné webové služby. Naše databáze v tuto chvíli obsahuje 2906070 obálek a 876950 obsahů českých a zahraničních publikací. Naše API využívá většina knihoven v ČR.

Registrovat »    Zapomenuté heslo?

Deconstruction as analytic philosophy



Autor: Wheeler, Samuel C.
Rok: 2000
ISBN: 9780804737524
ISBN: 9780804737531
OKCZID: 110667668

Citace (dle ČSN ISO 690):
WHEELER, Samuel C. Deconstruction as analytic philosophy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2000. viii, 294 s. Cultural memory in the present.


Anotace

 

In this collection of essays Samuel Wheeler discusses Derrida and other “deconstructive” thinkers from the perspective of an analytic philosopher willing to treat deconstruction as philosophy, taking it seriously enough to look for and analyze its arguments. The essays focus on the theory of meaning, truth, interpretation, metaphor, and the relationship of language to the world. Wheeler links the thought of Derrida to that of Davidson and argues for close affinities among Derrida, Quine, de Man, and Wittgenstein. He also demonstrates the propinquity of Plato and Derrida and shows that New Criticism shares deconstruction’s conception of language. Of the twelve essays in the collection, four are published here for the first time. The fundamental resemblance between Derrida and such analytic thinkers as Quine, Wittgenstein, and Davidson, the author argues, is that they deny the possibility of meanings as self-interpreting media constituting thoughts and intentions. Derrida argues that some form of magic language has determined the very project of philosophy, and his arguments work out the consequences of denying that there are such self-interpreting mental contents. In addition, Derrida and Davidson agree in denying any “given.” Without a given, questions about realism and idealism cease to have a point. Derrida and Davidson are both committed to the textuality of all significant marks, whether in neurons or on paper. They argue that there is no mode of representation more direct than language.

Zdroj anotace: OKCZ - ANOTACE Z WEBU



Dostupné zdroje

Amazon


Přidat komentář a hodnocení

Od: (127.0.0...)